How is that relevant. A decent scientist can critique general design aspects of a paper in any field. They're hardly splitting hairs on some niche topic.
It's beyond simple supply and demand. This was in response to a social media post that had a tenuous relationship with reality (or 'fluid' as the Whitehouse now calls it).
I'm writing this from CT. There are absolutely door to door solar salespeople (they don't work for the manufacturer, they work for a local distributor/installation service), and they absolutely tell you how many people in your neighborhood have bought from them.
Pretty much every time a contractor does something to any of my neighbors homes, they knock on my door and say "2 or 3 other neighbors are doing X (pesticides, windows, landscaping, new water heater, power washer, etc. etc). Your home was built around the same time as theirs. Because all of my crew is already in the area on (date) I'm offering half off if you agree to service".
The fact is that these contractors really do have significant efficiency gains if they can get multiple neighbors to agree to similar work. So it behooves them to do at least a bit of door knocking.
There are a number of companies that specialize in using an in-person, in-home encounter to put pressure on people to make poor purchases decisions, enough so that many states have implemented buyer’s remorse laws.
We don't have any pro-free-speech political parties, nor a written constitution unfortunately.
I mean there are parties that say they like free speech, but it never extends to the sort of speech they disagree with, or by people of the wrong colour/religion/gender etc.
reply