I saw this earlier and I noted that news agencies seemed to be reluctant to post it. CNN has been on this from the jump. I think people are afraid of it being revealed as a fake. There is some serious validation that needs to occur if this is the case.
The best way to learn is relentless curiosity. There's always a big
difference between the stuff you need to know and the stuff you want to
know. If you're truly fascinated by how things work and you really want
to know how they work, learning is much easier and far more enjoyable.
The best part is, even if the learning is actually horribly difficult,
you never notice you're suffering since you're having a lot of fun.
I started messing around with satellite based data broadcast systems in
high school during the mid 80's due to my dad's work. The systems
delivered real time stock, commodities, and futures data at a time long
before the craze of web based "Internet Trading". Back then, only the
most serious trading businesses had real time quotes and the systems
were connected by either satellite or dedicated lines. Since it was a
"broadcast" systems (one-to-many), it's fundamentally similar to
satellite television broadcasting.
The two-way satellite data/voice systems work on similar principles but
there are a few major designs in use. Some satellite phones work with
an array of sats in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and only require an adequate
pole/stick antenna. Other satellite phones work with satellites in
geostationary orbit and require a two-way dish for both broadcast and
receive. All of the satellite based Internet Service Providers (ISP)
serving rural areas use geostationary satellites.
Some people wonder how Steve Wozniak can live in (near) the Silicon
Valley and still complain about broadband speeds/coverage in the US.
He doesn't live too far from me up in the hills above the valley, and
the odds of fast broadband every reaching up here are very slim. As you
might expect, I've run a satellite based Internet connection in the
past, so I got a chance to learn the internals of those systems as well.
Satellite based Internet connections have very high latency. The minimum
ping time is roughly about 480 ms ... umm, I think, but for fun, let's
do the math:
Geostationary Orbit: 35,786,000 meters elevation.
Speed of light: 299,792,458 metres per second.
The ping request would travel from you up to the satellite and then back
down to the ground station, so it travels twice the distance of
geostationary orbit (up and back).
The ping reply would also travel from the ground station up to the
satellite and then back down to you, so it also travels twice the
distance of geostationary orbit.
(4 * 35,786,000) / 299,792,458 = 0.47747
Yep, pretty close to the 480 ms I remembered, but that's just the raw
travel time under totally unrealistic conditions. In reality, you're a
lot farther away from the satellite rather than directly below it at sea
level, and there would also be some over-head for the computer systems
involved.
The above also assumes you're on a dedicated transponder (i.e. you have
a very expensive chunk of frequency dedicated to your sole use), but
since you never get a dedicated transponder on a consumer service, ping
times can be in excess of 3000 ms on a regular basis. The transponder
space allocated to the ISP is shared amongst all of the ISP's customers
via TDMA. FDMA, FTDMA, and I think occasionally CDMA. Even when you know
how to tune your own TCP/IP stack and all of your applications to adjust
for the high latency, using a lot of typical things (like web browsing)
are still absolutely miserable. Think about it this way; every time you
click on something, you have to wait 3 seconds for anything to happen.
It drives most people nuts, so using a satellite based ISP is a last
resort, and in some ways it sucks more than using a 14,400 baud phone
line modem.
You see, once you learn some of the basics, then you have a base for
learning more fun stuff, but most importantly, you also gain the
advantage of being able to "reason" about how other related things work.
