Yes it's even more effective this way IMO, we will probably see some 11/10 mental gymnastics from people condemning this and failing to apply the same standards to billions dollars corps.

Yeah it's just a slightly more honest and simplified presentation of what LLMs providers do IMO.

Eh I think part of the joke is that LLMs have gobbled up the original source code, and if you help them enough (identical type signatures and specs), they will output the same code, it's the copyright laundering problem.

Yeah it’s funny this little mishap gets traction here in the age of commercial LLMs and generative AI... Bashing microsoft never gets old I guess

Yeah it’s hilarious seeing people lose their shit over this and not like, every commercial LLM vendor...

No, my conclusion is that if even smart people do not elaborate on any usage of AI (regardless which brand they put) is a clear sign that we are not talking about "mass adoption"

I remember writing a parser for some SL instructions following an HN thread, seems like it was 13 years ago -_- : https://github.com/guillaume86/SolLewitt

Don't need to be a nerd, 5 secs google search: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/death-rates-road-incident...

Well that explains it then, don't offer stupid salaries before you make stupid money...

They also outperformed themselves before being in a leader position...