Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bdcravens's commentslogin

As long as you're concerned about guidelines:

> If a story is spam or off-topic, flag it. Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead. If you flag, please don't also comment that you did.


I'm also 50 and just realized it.

What process are other companies using?

Amazon Developer sent me an email about this recently. They supported:

* Passport

* Identity Card

* Driver's License

It rejected my Driver's License and I gave up after that.


At least in the UK it would be entirely legal for companies to use account age as a proxy for verifying you're over the age of 18. If your Apple account is over 18 then you probably are as well.

Apple verified my account that very way this morning!

> Even though my software is packaged and notarised as per their requirements, they still show my users a dialog box confirming they want to run my app, something they do not for apps installed through their walled garden. This is just friction to punish developers outside their store. I am very tired of it.

Does them quitting Apple mean they're going to stop supporting MacOS users?


I don't think people are using AI to create new dependencies that they're then submitting to open source package managers (which is what this shows)

This is more useful for discussing what kind of projects AI is being used for than whether it's being used.


> But based on the hype (100x productivity!), there should be a deluge of high quality mobile apps, Saas offerings, etc. There is a huge profit incentive to create quality software at a low price.

1. People aren't creating new apps, but enhancing existing ones

2. Companies are less likely to pay for new offerings when the barrier to entry is lowered due to AI. They'll just vibe code what they need.


I don't think the 2nd point will make a huge impact on software sales. Who is vibe coding? Software developers or business types? They aren't going to vibe code a CRM, or their own bespoke version of Excel, or their own Datadog APM.

Maybe they will vibe code small scripts, but nobody was really paying for software to do that in the first place. Saas-pocalypse is just people vibe investing, not really understanding the value proposition of saas in the first place (no maintenance, no deployments, SLAs, no database backups, etc).


Perfect example of what you’re talking about: today a coworker of mine showed off a vibecoded data viewer app that lets him view our analytics in a way that works well for his job, using our analytics platform’s API. A nice little personal productivity boost for him, but not something that will ever replace the analytics platform itself.

I've had better luck telling it to use CadQuery. Here's an example where I stumbled around a bit, but was successful in creating a cat food container (Sheba Perfect Portions) dispenser

https://claude.ai/share/ebce7c8e-4e5a-42ec-8ee9-cf066f68858f


You might have an easier time doing that with claude code.

Possibly, but for reasonably quick tasks it's nice to get previews or downloadable artifacts in the UI (I use the Claude Desktop app)

Very true. It's not like EV owners were feeling regret when gas hit the (mythical ) $2/gallon. Honestly, while it's fun to know I've "saved" $5k or so in gas costs during the 4 years I've owned my EV, if saving money was my only goal, I would have paid cash for a slightly used efficient four cylinder gas car.

It's not like EV owners were feeling regret when gas hit the (mythical ) $2/gallon.

Gas could be free, and I'd still have no regrets. Because an EV is simply the better vehicle. And I think after over a decade of mass-produced EVs that maybe it's time to get away from "saves on gas" or "good for the environment", and maybe start marketing as "full every time you pull out of the garage", or something. Kind of like Mazda's old commercials for their Wankel engine cars: "piston engine goes 'boing', but the Mazda goes 'hmmmmm'".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHzeGEHWMjo


I'd be more interested in EVs if they didn't come with significant privacy and complexity trade-offs.

I don't want a door handle that can't open in an emergency. I don't want my vehicle constantly phoning home to the mothership (sadly I have to deal with that today, I really need to go disable that functionality). I certainly don't want a touchscreen through which all controls are routed.

I have a 20-year-old Jeep with significant mechanical problems; I should really convert it to a BEV.


I'd be more interested in EVs if they didn't come with significant privacy and complexity trade-offs.

You're going to be really disappointed when you go to look at new ICE vehicles. This "EVs are a privacy nightmare!" trope needs to die, all cars do that now.

I don't want a door handle that can't open in an emergency.

Only one car manufacturer to my knowledge has that problem, just don't buy one of those. Again, nothing to do with electric cars.

I certainly don't want a touchscreen through which all controls are routed.

So far, other than the poorly-designed door handles of one manufacturer, nothing you've listed is unique to EVs. All you've done is describe "most new cars".


I understand modern vehicles are like that, hence my complaint about my current one.

But, by definition, most EVs are modern. That's not true of ICE vehicles, hence the tradeoffs.


Fair enough, point taken.

You're probably right, but that's not the usual wording you hear. Of course, when grieving, proper proofreading may not be (nor should it be) at the top of anyone's list.

I see you haven't spent much time on Twitter the past 10 years :-)

<insert no body quits twitter rick and Morty meme>

This isn't Twitter though.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: