Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | conartist6's commentslogin

But it's a perfect fit for their business strategy of forcibly inserting their software into your anus..! How could it have gone wrong??

Still feels very anti-consumer.

If every company behaved like you do, the internet would be a much worse place.

In fact, OpenAI has already made the Internet a much worse place, already much, much less open and much less optimistic about its own future than it was even five years ago...


It outperforms your friends, and all your have to do is have a relationship with it and let it know that you want the truth... Why not just have a relationship with your friends and let them know that you can handle the truth?

It could have a special heated area of the desk that isn't used for any technological purpose

It doesn't work. I have the laptop next to my screen and an external keyboard. The cat always chooses the cold external keyboard instead of the warm laptop, because that's the center of my attention.

It will all collapse well before that given that it is sucking existing value out of society rather than making new value.

If models could take over all meaningful work there would be nothing left for humans to do but war.


I don't punch a single punchcard by hand, and nobody does. Doesn't that mean we're already fully automated?

Someone called for me!? It's deeply unfashionable to believe in human potential, but, well, I do. I am one of the last working (human) hackers. See: https://paulgraham.com/hp.html.

My reasoning in not using AI (at all) is many-fold. First, I am a powerful learning model, the most powerful one I have access to. This model is so powerful that to reach its true potential I must continually feed it huge amounts of learning experiences and training data. I must seek out other unique perspectives and try to understand them. There is virtually no end to the amount of data this model in me can process and integrate using tools like "philosophy" and "logic".

Second, it seems to me that models have shown us that the human limitation is not our ability to think, but how fast we can type. The model-first people think that means that we must find a way to offload all our ideas to agents, since agents are on the other side of the low-bandwidth interface that is the keyboard. I just think we need to arm the human with more expressive tools: an instrument, not an assistant.

Third, most people have stopped believing in the potential of great software. They seem to think that the tools we have now are the best that can ever be made, so by their reasoning there wouldn't be much point to getting good at building new things when instead you could learn to copy what already exists.

If you're interested in the tools we're making to mint a whole new generation of (human) hackers, I would urge you to come check out the BABLR Discord! It's where we work on our tools, talk philosophy, and boot anyone who tries to sell us their AI shit. https://discord.gg/NfMNyYN6cX

Every line of this code in the BABLR ecosystem was written by human hands too: https://github.com/orgs/bablr-lang/. In five years of full-time OSS work I've built a streaming regex engine, the world's most powerful streaming parser, a language-agnostic AST/CST format, and a data serialization language that will eventually replace both XML and HTML: https://docs.bablr.org/guides/cstml


are you against technologically modifying your body in order to become more productive? if no, then why not do that?

Well I put a ski straight through my ulnar nerve once and a surgeon had to splice nerve lining from my wrist into my elbow.

I'm also currently wearing technological augmentations on my wrists. I call them "the gloves of coding" and they help me not succumb to carpel tunnel.

And yeah, I spend all my time building developer tools, which are a technological means of augmenting your brain. I just happen to focus on technology that is deterministic.


what about directly connecting two "powerful" human learning models directly? can you do this without disrupting your determinacy dynamics?

Wouldn't that just be two humans having a conversation like we are now? Or beyond a conversation humans build relationships -- I do that too, and those relationships influence and guide me. I cherish them.

can your developer tools exponentially increase the subjective/internal bandwidth between the participants of a conversation? if yes, how?

by climbing the ladder of abstraction

are your developer tools capable of implementing telepathy? enable the exact recording of sleep dreams?

well I have to say that that wasn't one of my goals, though I do sometimes have ideas in my sleep and do them

there's a gigantic market. believe me

Perhaps there is, but I'm not a neuroscientist and also that would be a hardware startup. I write code by hand in part because i need to do the work to know how to make good tools for doing the work.

Well fuck you too.

If you can't be arsed to improve the world for humans but you are tripping over your shoelaces to kiss AI's boots, fuck you


Yeah it's not just the hardware depreciating, it's the social impact of what the model can do

Holy shit they crossed the line to "actually fucking evil"

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: