Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | khurrams's commentslogin

Hi We are an offshore company and have developed various corporate applications and few ranging to top download both on iPhone & Android. We charge only $ 30 an hour ! I feel like , i am charging lowest but have developed some really interesting applications ! We also developed ODesk's iPhone App ( those are considering using elance , ODesk etc ) !


I worked with Dan on making iPhone Application using TS webservice. Without any doubt, world wont be same without Dan - He was a great person ! My condolences to Tom, and Dan's friends and family


Thanks ! I have my fingers corssed :)


I have submitted my applicaiton. But it has very low chances for getting through !


What would be the differences ? There ought to be some differences though ? Native applications were supposedly more powerful !


Wow, this is amazing. My startup, which i submitted for YC startup, which focussing on developing IPhone applications, faster , better and cheaper only charges 30 US $ an hour. Might be because, we are an offshore company. www.geniteam.com I am looking for a partner for the VC application, let me know if you are interested. Khurram Samad


Can anyone provide suggestions, as how can i "repackage", what we have to pitch to YC-Combinator ?


I am thankful to everyone for providing assistance. I have submitted the application based on my understanding.


Hi I think basic reason would be learning from Technoprenuers and mentors, because we dont have much success stories within Pakistan. With 15 K US $, we can support a team for 3 months. However, more important perspective is : Can we become a brand for building IPhone Applications faster, better and cheaper ? Can we build applications and charge subscription for maintiance ( we already are charing small amount ) ? Is the segment lucerative enough to make good profits for next 2-3 years ?


This is right analysis. However, ROI might be lesser but risk of failture would be lesser as well ? But, there is chance that we *"might" become a brand for IPhone apps development. If you can build reuseable libraries, then i beleive you can scale faster ?


Venture investors are not looking for things with a low risk of failure. In fact, all other things being equal, we're looking for the things with the highest risk of failure-- like starting a new search engine in 1998.


It's not that they like risk the are just more willing to invest at high risk than most people. Would you drop 10 Million for a 1 in 500 chance of 10 Billion dollars? It's a good bet bet but it can take a while before your first hit.


Would I spend 1e7 make an investment with an expected value of 1e9*(1/.5e3) = 2e6?


Hm, on closer inspection, I would for 10 billion and an average 2x return. I sure that wish I could delete both these comments.


Venture investors are not looking for things with a low risk of failure.

Doug Richard (of BBC's Dragons' Den) says the same thing, here (starts at 4:10 of 6:57; moneyline at 5:30):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z71dl3lZdvU

You have to understand how investment works. The reason it [the risk-focused pitch] works well is because if there is no risk, there cannot be commensurate reward. I'll repeat it. If there is no risk, there can't be reward. If it's not a risky opportunity, then there's no reward of equal dimension. If you come to me and say, "I've got a risk-free investment," the first thing I know is, there's not much money to be made. There's no free lunch in this world.


I agree !


We have a mixed model : We have developed few reuseable components for quick IPhone development. However, people using those would be developers. I dont have the numbers though. You might consider reviwing our startup at (www.geniteam.com).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: