Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | notnullorvoid's commentslogin

Astro supports generating static html, so I suspect it'll work similarly where you can have some routes static and others dynamically created.

The goal of web hosting is to provide low latency wide availability to many users.

AI in this context has a very different goal as a tool for individual users.

You wouldn't say that hosting instances of Photoshop on servers and charging for usage is a long term viable business would you? Even if current consumer computers struggled to run Photoshop.


I don't see an issue with the comparison, I don't think it is meant to be a 1 to 1 or anything, just an illustration of how consumers are overwhelmingly lazy.

I'd take issue with the statement that it is for the paranoid, but I guess it might be a defense mechanism because of course i am interested in local models. If my new workflow is going to be dependent on 3 companies, I'd prefer if there is a light at the end of the tunnel that breaks us free.


It's interesting to see so many people agree with this perspective when it comes to articles yet disagree when it comes to writing software.

Perhaps some form of Gell-Mann Amnesia, people are better at recognizing good articles than they are at recognizing good software. Combined with a vibe coding effect of never actually reading the source, and thus recognizing how bad it is.


Hulk: I'm always angry

AI: I'm always guessing


Hating the player is a integral part of the game.

Think of it as spatial input, not visual. Blind people do have spatial inputs, and high spatial intelligence.

Visual intelligence is a near meaningless term as it's almost entirely dependant on spatial intelligence. The visually impaired do have high spatial intelligence, I wouldn't be surprised if their spatial intelligence is actually higher on average than those without visual impairment.

They have enough lawyers that they can easily find another criminal avenue that doesn't step on the previous path.

Your opinion isn't particularly important in our legal system. Since your comment expresses a preconceived notion of the accused's guilt. It would disqualify you from a jury, and undermine your legitimacy in a judicial, defensive and even prosecutorial function.

Though I respect it as a human opinion.


As usual the company is going to financially shield those responsible, while they in turn shield the company from societal blame.

I'd much rather they get personally fined and/or banned from holding leadership positions in the field (with varying timeframes depending on the level of responsibility).

Naming and shaming won't do much good. It could backfire and serve as a positive mark on their resume for other morally corrupt leaders.


Short prison sentences would be a good deterant for white collar crime, rather than fines.

I think it depends on the level of responsibility. If orders came from above, then sure through those most directly responsible for the order in prison. I also think the lower level leaders should be held accountable for relaying the orders, which is where I think a "can no longer hold this position of authority for ~2 years" punishment might be appropriate.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: