> this report is propaganda (also known as fake news)
While propaganda can be biased or misleading, I'm reminded of the quote that the best salesmen tell only the truth, but a selective truth that closes the sale.
>second, amnesty international is NGO funded by George Soros; so it's expected to be politically biased, and cannot be trusted
Ad hominem attack.
> none of their evidence can be used in court, they are all based on hearsays, that's one of tricks one's can use to tell a propaganda from news based on facts
There's plenty of places where hearsay can be used, although I'm sure Amnesty International can pay a plane ticket to get a witness to a court. And just because it's propaganda, doesn't mean it isn't news based on facts. For example, lots of stuff coming out of the Pentagon. Back to my first rebuttal, that just because it's propaganda doesn't mean it's not true.
ok, your point, that accusation does not add much to the argument, and it does not negate the facts I presented? I'm questioning the motive behind the report. and questioning the integrity of amnesty international with supporting facts. it's like someone questioning a propaganda by nazi germany, as it promotes hitler agenda. would you accuse that someone with "Ad hominem attack"
> And just because it's propaganda, doesn't mean it isn't news based on facts.
what facts? this argument is pointless, hearsay is not fact, and hearsay is not admissible in court, that's a fact; we are talking about people who behead other people and eat their liver, do you think it would be too hard for them to make up some stuff and lie. unless they show verifiable facts about dates, locations, victim names, etc.. you can only assume it's fabricated lies.
you should watch a canadian journalist who went to syria and listened to eye witnesses [1], that's a fact, not a report of anonymous people claiming stuff
While propaganda can be biased or misleading, I'm reminded of the quote that the best salesmen tell only the truth, but a selective truth that closes the sale.
>second, amnesty international is NGO funded by George Soros; so it's expected to be politically biased, and cannot be trusted
Ad hominem attack.
> none of their evidence can be used in court, they are all based on hearsays, that's one of tricks one's can use to tell a propaganda from news based on facts
There's plenty of places where hearsay can be used, although I'm sure Amnesty International can pay a plane ticket to get a witness to a court. And just because it's propaganda, doesn't mean it isn't news based on facts. For example, lots of stuff coming out of the Pentagon. Back to my first rebuttal, that just because it's propaganda doesn't mean it's not true.