Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I wonder what the "rot factor" is for scientific citations? Some professional societies I am in mandate URLs for bibliographical references. Most of the time these are peer-reviewed articles. But they can be softer references like Wiki reviews, data repositories, etc.


There are some info/studies about it linked here that show it's fairly high: https://perma.cc/#landing-problem

Perma.cc was created by the Harvard Law School Library specifically to try to solve that issue, since so many citation links were becoming useless.


DOIs are "suppose" to help solve this problem.

I've often encountered a sort of "reverse link rot" where a cited article is in another language or obscure journal or reference material that was never digitized and is inaccessible.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: