> Isn't providing a "Neutral" source of news basically impossible? Even if you could somehow address all sides of a story (e.g. besides actual scientists let's also interview some flat earthers to allow them to explain how the Earth is flat) the mere fact that there's too much to report and the channel invariably needs to choose what goes on air mean that it's no longer neutral.

Giving air time to flat-earthers isn't neutral, it's pandering to idiots.

Neutral is clear and factual reporting on issues, regardless of where on the political spectrum that lands you.