It currently costs less to run a node per month than it does to do three transactions on the blockchain in the same period. Why would anyone care to run a node if the transactions aren't affordable.
If the blocksize was increased to double its current resource requirements, where i live in Australia, it would be impossible to run a node at any price.
And because the people who run nodes know this, they reject your proposals that reduce bitcoin network security.
The specifics of the difficulty adjustment algorithm are not critical to the original vision, but way to deflect (from the original scaling plan) to a different point.
>>If you don't run a node, or you can't run a node because of resource requirements, you're not a peer.
Where in the original white-paper is the emergency difficulty adjustment?
https://medium.com/@jimmysong/bitcoin-cash-difficulty-adjust...
> peer-to-peer
If you don't run a node, or you can't run a node because of resource requirements, you're not a peer.