Solution: Hire 10,000 people to vet the feedback and funnel it into the org. Those people vet 6-7 feedback per hour, or 18-21 if you keep the operation running 24/7.
But that would cut into the Profit from the Money Printing Machine.
Saying "We're doing business on a scale that's too big for us to be (profitably) accountable" isn't an acceptable answer.
Imagine Google is a public utility.
Would it be worthwhile for the society to spend that much manpower to funnel the feedback brute-force way like that ? To me, it clearly is a waste of money for the society, and an inefficient and pointless way to improve the product.
This kind of deontological approach is not very useful unless it's applied to a morally important issue, and even then, an utilitarian/consequentialist approach is needed to cross-check to make sure deontological approach doesn't go astray.
But that would cut into the Profit from the Money Printing Machine.
Saying "We're doing business on a scale that's too big for us to be (profitably) accountable" isn't an acceptable answer.