Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Haven’t read anything about this yet but based on what I’ve seen I’m not that concerned.

It’s like getting mad at (insert food) but then not knowing whether it’s a bad food.



Google makes money selling pharma ads. A lot of money. This can help them make more.


Google doesn't even use Gmail data to target ads. It strains credulity to believe they'd use medical data to do so, even assuming that is legal.


> Google doesn't even use Gmail data to target ads

...Anymore. They did exactly this from basically launch up to 2017, and they only stopped because it was scaring corporate customers away from buying GSuite. https://www.theverge.com/2017/6/23/15862492/google-gmail-adv...


Yes, although as the article says, gmail was the exception rather than the rule in that most other products did not use customer documents and data to personalize ads. In any case, that was three years ago, and it hardly seems likely that Google will go back to that practice given the increasingly sensitive views of the public toward the use of customer data. It is not my claim that Google would never have used Fitbit data in this way if it had acquired them in the past, only that it seems unlikely that they will on a forward-looking basis.



It is legal.


What's the issue with that?


Just the long established norms of health privacy dating from the 5th Century BC.

Admittedly those social codes are really legacy cruft that SV should refactor so we can better monetizing suffering.


>Haven’t read anything about this yet but

If you want to just shout into the void over headlines then you might find the following sites more familiar for you:

https://www.reddit.com

https://www.facebook.com

https://www.twitter.com


They all say I need an account to view them, phishing? Yikes!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: