Thanks for the links. When you said "majority" I kind of thought maybe you had an exhaustive list and had debunked at least half plus one. I've seen those and I consider the claims he is responding to to be unpersuasive.

What would you consider the most persuasive statistical proof?

I'm not convinced that "proof" is the right term but I'd like to hear the response to the claims that time-series data from election night reveals negative vote updates.