Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> in part this is a reflection of taxonomists inability to sell themselves and adapt to new tools (but note that many have evolved)

What tools did they fail to learn? If we went from a state of identifying species to not identifying them, and the major change is removing the taxonomists, isn't it arguable that they were doing fine if not better than without them?



Not sure I understand.

A - we identified species B - we removed our ability to identify species

A & B therefor

C - we're better off

... doesn't seem to follow. Something is missing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: