> Even calling it "non-violent communication" implies that more direct styles of communication are "violent", and veers towards manipulative exclusion of your peers.
The increasing use of the word "violence" to describe clearly non-violent things greatly disturbs me.
It could lead to people reacting more strongly to words than literal, physical violence. And I think that is a very very bad direction for society to go.
The increasing use of the word "violence" to describe clearly non-violent things greatly disturbs me.
It could lead to people reacting more strongly to words than literal, physical violence. And I think that is a very very bad direction for society to go.