Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Indeed. I would gladly pay $50 bucks just to be able to split windows in my textmate.


Is this the reason people commenting seem legitimately excited? I'm a Linux/vim guy; I appreciate when people make lean, straightforward 'simple' applications but this just appears to be a Macified version of vim... since TextMate was supposed to be Macified vim, I couldn't really see the point.

I hate to be a neckbeard on this one, but I get irritated when Mac guys conflate 'simple' and 'graphical'. If this editor had been designed for a niche application (subethaedit), kept track of your most-used features and only emphasized those, or did something to simplify your overall editing experience I would be all for it. Instead I see an editor that replaced vim's look with a graphical one, like the palette swaps old videogames used to turn the good guys into the bad (same with versions of NetHack that had graphical tiles). Reminds me of that weird TermKit thing: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2559734

I really want to break out of the terminal. It's crufty and old, but what's more disappointing is that no contender has yet matched or even surpassed its zen. Come on guys, build it already.


I think zen is the keyword. Apps like textmate or this one or mac os/apps in general are not simple because it's cool to be simple - they just hide the power that's under the hood so your tired eyes and brain can focus on the task at hand. But ultimately it's about your own zen: whatever makes each one happier and more productive, be it eclipse, netbeans, vim or textmate.

I really want to break out of the terminal.

Have you tried MacVim?


> Have you tried MacVim?

Maybe if it's in the next Debian release


Don't worry, it is nearly identical to vim-gtk in Debian :).

Since MacVim is a Cocoa application it integrates more nicely in OS X than vim-gtk would.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: