The purpose of the domain seizures was to disrupt -- ideally, to shut down -- websites that the US copyright industries didn't like. Causing them substantial hardship was the entire purpose of the seizure, and to argue that the seizure didn't cause that is purely dishonest.
Exactly. If he's saying it shouldn't be a big deal to get back up at another address, then why is he allowing ICE to seize it in the first place, and what's the point of his ruling?
