There's an assumption in this blog post that underpins a lot of semantic web stuff, even the biggies like Powerset: that people can, will and prefer to type out "correct" semantic queries versus simply throwing a few keywords into Google. Granted keyword searching is a bit of a skill and individual searches can often take some massaging to get the right info, but I'm not sure that everybody prefers to type out full questions instead.
On a related tangent: has anyone here ever had one of the semantic web search startups actually answer a question they had? I mean a real question, not a demo one cooked up to show off tailored results. I haven't, I even gave Powerset a try the last time I genuinely had a question - "are dogs carnivores?" - retarded example I know but I genuinely couldn't remember. Here's the results:
Useless. Interestingly, the older mainstream search engines had no problem answering the question right in their search results - both Ask and Google even suggested various questions in a drop down and auto completed my query.
On a related tangent: has anyone here ever had one of the semantic web search startups actually answer a question they had? I mean a real question, not a demo one cooked up to show off tailored results. I haven't, I even gave Powerset a try the last time I genuinely had a question - "are dogs carnivores?" - retarded example I know but I genuinely couldn't remember. Here's the results:
http://www.powerset.com/explore/go/are-dogs-carnivores%3F
Useless. Interestingly, the older mainstream search engines had no problem answering the question right in their search results - both Ask and Google even suggested various questions in a drop down and auto completed my query.
ask: http://tinyurl.com/4wu9z4
google: http://tinyurl.com/543t7h