its easy to make bad SPAs nowadays. imo more time needs to be spent in the tool/environment/framework/language selection and evaluation process.
also, many SPAs cant even handle basic forms correctly anymore, because developers learn more javascript than html5. like the author pointed out, rebuilding features in js that already exist, just because one is unaware of the fact that it exists or what the underlying design choices have been, often is a bad idea.
are there actually still people that care about noscript? i mean, i get that most people dont care and js is enabled by default in most browsers, but the no-js-web-world is also quite interesting.
its easy to make bad SPAs nowadays. imo more time needs to be spent in the tool/environment/framework/language selection and evaluation process.
also, many SPAs cant even handle basic forms correctly anymore, because developers learn more javascript than html5. like the author pointed out, rebuilding features in js that already exist, just because one is unaware of the fact that it exists or what the underlying design choices have been, often is a bad idea.
are there actually still people that care about noscript? i mean, i get that most people dont care and js is enabled by default in most browsers, but the no-js-web-world is also quite interesting.