"I've seen this in a completely different jurisdiction but don't remember even a single specific" is not a particularly compelling counterargument.

I don't think this thread had the tone of an argument at all. If there were two people seriously butting heads going back and forth on something, yeah sure. But pulling a [Citation Needed] on some people who aren't experts but want to have a sincere and pretty civil discussion feels a bit much.

You mean "common law"? US Constitutional law is deeply based on "legal precedent".