> No viewpoint is wrong, because there is no such thing as right.
"2 + 2 = 5"
"do mutlti-threaded reads and writes to a shared mutable data structure and you absolutely never have to worry about race conditions, clobbering or corruption"
do you still think all viewpoints are equal and none are right?
Absolutely, assuming you are not trying to take my quote out of context. You can do whatever you feel is best.
Take, for example:
做多线程读取和写入到一个共享的可变数据结构，你绝对不会担心竞争条件，会破坏或腐败
Maybe you can grok that, though chances are that you cannot. It is still just as valid for someone to believe it is an efficient method of communication though, even if you disagree.
Generally accepted patterns can be useful, but it takes people pushing that envelope for us to evolve.
As many have notes in the past, 2 + 2 does equal 5 for sufficiently large values of 2. Marking it as an absolute falsehood merely indicates an insufficient knowledge of various areas of mathematics.
"2 + 2 = 5"
"do mutlti-threaded reads and writes to a shared mutable data structure and you absolutely never have to worry about race conditions, clobbering or corruption"
do you still think all viewpoints are equal and none are right?