Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

FWIW I can't build OpenAI into our product without huge headaches around privacy policies and getting additional customer consent. I can build Amazon services into our products because Amazon is a trusted vendor and we use an AWS stack already.

Because Anthropic / Claude is available via Amazon Bedrock, they have a significant advantage in any company that's already using AWS. If you're on Azure, OpenAI has that advantage.



OpenAI has committed to never training on API data. You no longer need a DPA for this.

https://openai.com/enterprise-privacy


You can enter a DPA (data processing agreement) with OpenAI that forbids subsequent training on submitted content.


Yes, that involves getting lawyers involved which is the aforementioned headache.


And I… believe that?


Is there a reason to believe Amazon is more trustworthy than OpenAI?


> FWIW I can't build OpenAI into our product without huge headaches around privacy policies and getting additional customer consent

Doesn't this imply that a new competitor beginning with a lenient customer privacy policies as well as a customer base that doesn't care as much about privacy will rise up to challenge you? And possibly iterate faster?


Yes, but in enterprise software 'lenient customer privacy policies' don't last long.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: