Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Oh heavens whatever caused you to believe this? The momentum p of a photon is given by p=h/λ where h is the Plank Constant and λ is the wavelength. Compton won a Nobel prize for this.


Believe what?

Of course p = h/λ. Thus the relativistic mass m is given by p/v = p/c = h/cλ. And a photon's energy is given by E = hc/λ. This is all in agreement with the relativistic mass you'd calculate from the photon energy E = mc².

Heavens, which of these do you not believe?


Relativistic mass isn’t really sensible as a concept. Does something moving fast gravitate more because it has more mass? No.


Except that it does gravitate more. Avoiding the confusion that it doesn't is one of the conceptual benefits of relativistic mass. Gravitation is dependent on the stress-energy tensor, which contains... drum roll... relativistic mass, not rest mass!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress%E2%80%93energy_tensor

For that matter, you've already noticed that the Lorentz transform becomes nonsensical as v → c when starting from rest mass, whereas the transform works just fine when using relativistic mass as the starting point, and nothing blows up, and you can avoid any confusion.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: