Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

why not ada? Sure rust didn't exist when linux was first being built, but ada did and had a number of memory safety features. (not the same as rust's, but still better than C)


The "historical anecdote" is that somewhen around kernel 0.99, C++ was tried. And given up due to both compiler bugs and (worse) abysmal compilation performance.

For all I know about Ada, the latter has a reputation for "non-speed" on compile worse than C++ even. Nevermind that gnats (gcc ada integration) post-dates Linux by a few years.

Of course, it could simply be that Linus looked, got an allergic fit, and hence didn't bother ...


Simple, when Linux was created gcc was Free, Ada compilers were expensive..




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: