Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

While this is cool, it is neither new or good.

The result looks great, no paint used! Must be ok?

To me it would still seem there was a cost of cleanup, therefore damage has been done. For the council to remove the graffiti they would have to clean the surronding pavement.

edit: I knew this would be downvoted, but my personal opinion still stands. This is not free to cleanup... Chalk is easier[to cleanup], chalk disapears with rain.



Encouraging public services to clean up the streets isn't damage in my book.

http://www.wired.com/underwire/2007/10/dirty-trick-cau/


Public services weren't leaving the streets dirty because they were lazy, they were leaving the streets dirty because they were rationing water due to drought...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: