You do realize that the "someone broke the rules" reason, unless supported by clear evidence of actual voting fraud is a very lose reason for canceling a democratic vote and really sticks ? This sets a very dangerous precedent and an unrealistic bar for all future elections.
Note that no evidence was presented to show that any of the candidates broke the rules, just that they might have benefited from third parties breaking the rules.
Not that is any of your business but I don't care about the candidate. I care about a corrupt system taking their abuse a step further, all in name of the democracy they are trampling on.
The precendent I was talking about is not legal. If they will be allowed to do this, then they will never be stopped.
How about Lasconi ? She would have won the presidency. Now, Ciolacu will.
> The precendent I was talking about is not legal. If they will be allowed to do this, then they will never be stopped.
They are allowed (by the constitution) to do this and they did do this. Your response is purely emotional and it will pass. I don't care about the candidate or about Lasconi, I personally would have had the same opinion about this decision if it was about any candidate.
