> The US offered them an agreement and Zelensky refused
Would you say this regardless of what the deal was? Am curious if there is some line that could be crossed that would make the deal unreasonable. The argument as it stands sounds like the logic of an abuser to those of us who felt the deal that was offered was in itself a slap in the face.
I would say either party has the right to consent or not to an agreement. Zelensky as I said exercised his right not to sign it and the US exercised their right to go their separate ways in regards to sharing of certain resources.
If a party doesn't consent to the agreement, they would not say be obligated to provide military aid against their will.
To follow your analogy. Your employer changes the terms, you refuse. Then a judge jails you for non payment of child support. What would be insane is if you turn around and blame the employer for going to jail. It wasn't the employer that put you in jail, they just helped keep you out of it for awhile but then decided they weren't happy with the continued arrangement.
Would you say this regardless of what the deal was? Am curious if there is some line that could be crossed that would make the deal unreasonable. The argument as it stands sounds like the logic of an abuser to those of us who felt the deal that was offered was in itself a slap in the face.