Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If he believes in the product he could have kept 100% of his company.


He kept 80%. The other 20% is owned by 8 different VCs. Seems like he's still in control. There's value in using other people's money instead of your own because it might make him less emotionally risk-averse in how he manages it.


100% of something without any measurable adoption or scale can suck.


Most of the time it's not about the money VCs send into it but the credibility that this brings. It looks a lot more mature when your idea is backed by a distribution of wealthy people.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: