Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Just that response seems to prove the cartoon's point.


I don't see how, really. Gelman himself is a (rather famous) Bayesian, and if you read the comments, you'll see that Randall himself pops up and basically cedes Gelman's point.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: