Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes, it is different when it happens to her. She represents one of the three branches of government. It is not within the authority of one branch to seize stuff from another.


Well, she's not just complaining about inter-branch stuff.

> And she said that the CIA appears to have violated the Fourth Amendment, which bars unreasonable searches and seizures, as well as various federal laws and a presidential executive order that prevents the agency from conducting domestic searches and surveillance.


OP's point was the Feinstein has been defending the NSA's programs, and has, until now, seen no problem whatsoever with the government spying on its citizens.


Possibly because she felt that there was some level of oversight. If she believes that the CIA are intimidating the people meant to be providing that oversight you can see how that might change someone's view of such things.


Perhaps she has seen some secret version of the Fourth Amendment that only applies to her. I hope I'm just joking here...


I thought it was 'we the people' with individual sovereignty and all that.


Moreover she is part of the group which provides a significant part of the oversight which allegedly makes such programmes "safe".

Both are bad but they're in a different league.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: