No it really doesn't. Think about the underlying abstraction. The point is that somewhere, the engine knew how to define a transformation "dog vision" on a set of objects, namely photos.
Taking it further, it's possible that "dog" was a transformation on "vision" and other visions are available.
As a math major who used Wolfram alpha for the last 3 years of my undergrad some odd years ago, I have to say I had an overwhelmingly positive impression of the product.
Taking it further, it's possible that "dog" was a transformation on "vision" and other visions are available.
As a math major who used Wolfram alpha for the last 3 years of my undergrad some odd years ago, I have to say I had an overwhelmingly positive impression of the product.