I personally think more as Steinbeck in "The Grapes of Wrath". The people in the organization are not evil, it is the organization itself which forces them to play certain roles to serve the group and the machine they have built.
Steinbeck portrayed the bank as a great machine in which each person working for it played a small role that they didn't necessarily like to play. Agents were forced to evict people from their land because they were not able to pay their mortgage, yet that was not something that they really wanted to do. It was something they had to do because of the corporation they were a part of.
No individual person in the corporation is evil (generally). However the corporation is bigger than each individual member.
So calling a corporation evil does not mean branding each individual person. Rather it means that you recognize that the corporation as a greater force causes evil things.
In that respect I don't see it as unrealistic to say then that the corporation can be evil.
Steinbeck portrayed the bank as a great machine in which each person working for it played a small role that they didn't necessarily like to play. Agents were forced to evict people from their land because they were not able to pay their mortgage, yet that was not something that they really wanted to do. It was something they had to do because of the corporation they were a part of.
No individual person in the corporation is evil (generally). However the corporation is bigger than each individual member.
So calling a corporation evil does not mean branding each individual person. Rather it means that you recognize that the corporation as a greater force causes evil things.
In that respect I don't see it as unrealistic to say then that the corporation can be evil.