If serving up the material isn't directly harmful to a child, it should be protected under the First Amendment to view and possess (not talking production).
If serving up the material is directly harmful to a child, then the FBI was engaging in abusing children.
The FBI wants to claim it is the second case when anyone else is doing it but the first case when they do it.
Very much so.
If serving up the material isn't directly harmful to a child, it should be protected under the First Amendment to view and possess (not talking production).
If serving up the material is directly harmful to a child, then the FBI was engaging in abusing children.
The FBI wants to claim it is the second case when anyone else is doing it but the first case when they do it.