> Intent matters, and he was found guilty of accessing a computer with authorization.
Right and a lot of people are saying that it's a miscarriage of justice to prosecute someone based on implied knowledge or assumed knowledge.
It wasn't proven the same way you can prove a great many other things. A jury was convinced of something, and that doesn't constitute actual proof. Just because the government says something is true doesn't make it so.
Right and a lot of people are saying that it's a miscarriage of justice to prosecute someone based on implied knowledge or assumed knowledge.
It wasn't proven the same way you can prove a great many other things. A jury was convinced of something, and that doesn't constitute actual proof. Just because the government says something is true doesn't make it so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Pi_Bill