Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

John Deere would say that you can reflash, smash, or replace the eeeprom if you want. But you can't create a new piece of software based on the old one.

I think you should be able too, because what is the harm, but I don't think the book analogy holds.

You aren't allowed to rewrite a book, even if you keep the copy yourself.



If I understand correctly, yes, you absolutely are allowed to rewrite a book if you keep the copy yourself.


I think you could argue that it is fair use, and maybe it is, but you are creative a derivative work. That is copyright infringement, unless the fair use exception fits.


No, distributing the derivative work is a violation of copyright. Creating it isn't.

(Disclaimer: IANAL. This is my understanding of the law, but is not legal advice.)


"to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;" 17 U.S. Code § 106

The mere act of preparing it is enough.

I am a lawyer, but this is still not legal advice.


Hmm. All right, contrary to the law, but wouldn't the damages be zero if you don't distribute? That is, while technically illegal, wouldn't there be no penalty?

[Note well: still not legal advice.]




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: